From rworkman at tuxaloosa.org  Thu Jul 21 22:44:15 2011
From: rworkman at tuxaloosa.org (Robby Workman)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:44:15 -0500
Subject: [Tuxaloosa] Mailman move
Message-ID: <20110721174415.5f575d30@liberty.rlwhome.lan>

Hey guys, 

We just finished moving mailman (well, everything) over to
a new server - http://harrier.slackbuilds.org - so if you're
reading this, everything should be fine.  :-)

-RW

From rworkman at tuxaloosa.org  Thu Jul 21 22:58:15 2011
From: rworkman at tuxaloosa.org (Robby Workman)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:58:15 -0500
Subject: [Tuxaloosa] Mailman move
In-Reply-To: <20110721174415.5f575d30@liberty.rlwhome.lan>
References: <20110721174415.5f575d30@liberty.rlwhome.lan>
Message-ID: <20110721175815.25b92411@liberty.rlwhome.lan>

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:44:15 -0500
Robby Workman <rworkman at tuxaloosa.org> wrote:

> Hey guys, 
> 
> We just finished moving mailman (well, everything) over to
> a new server - http://harrier.slackbuilds.org - so if you're
> reading this, everything should be fine.  :-)


Oh, and for anyone who has/had a mail account on the tuxaloosa
server, your username for send/receive auth has changed.  If
it was "yourname" before, now it will be "yourname at tuxaloosa.org"
instead.  The server name should now be mail.tuxaloosa.org for
both smtp and pop/imap; you can ignore the cacert warning for now.

-RW

From leprkhn at gmail.com  Thu Jul 21 22:49:34 2011
From: leprkhn at gmail.com (Erik Hanson)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:49:34 -0500
Subject: [Tuxaloosa] Mailman move
In-Reply-To: <20110721174415.5f575d30@liberty.rlwhome.lan>
References: <20110721174415.5f575d30@liberty.rlwhome.lan>
Message-ID: <CAOEp0Ff7EY-wUfD8mmqDz4LHCwysOg3fQ7yVGUT4iAwDOoae6g@mail.gmail.com>

Looks fine from here.
On Jul 21, 2011 5:44 PM, "Robby Workman" <rworkman at tuxaloosa.org> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> We just finished moving mailman (well, everything) over to
> a new server - http://harrier.slackbuilds.org - so if you're
> reading this, everything should be fine. :-)
>
> -RW
> _______________________________________________
> TUXaloosa mailing list
> TUXaloosa at tuxaloosa.org
> http://tuxaloosa.org/mailman/listinfo/tuxaloosa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tuxaloosa.org/pipermail/tuxaloosa/attachments/20110721/a095323c/attachment.html>

From wrmilling at gmail.com  Thu Jul 21 23:53:52 2011
From: wrmilling at gmail.com (Winston Milling)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:53:52 -0400
Subject: [Tuxaloosa] Low-End Boxes
In-Reply-To: <CAOoVq6w8KF5G1Boo6rNAMu9QTJXw47QLcn91-+Yk+TagDZiRMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOoVq6w8KF5G1Boo6rNAMu9QTJXw47QLcn91-+Yk+TagDZiRMA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOoVq6zZ1BxC2JCPdMg6K+efGb0YNu+RC4kbe8Xp_usANZ9L=Q@mail.gmail.com>

I guess I should specify that I do mean Virtual Private Servers. My current
one is OpenVZ running debian minimal with a few services added on. 512MB ram
burstable to 768, 50 GB HDD, and 1 TB transfer per month with 1 ipv4
allocation.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Winston Milling <wrmilling at gmail.com>wrote:

> I have been messing around with a few low end boxes, mostly found through
> http://lowendbox.com, and I was wondering if anyone else in the group
> buys/has bought/ or uses anything that fits that bill. What are your
> experiences, who is good, etc. Right now I am primarily with a company, or
> single guy it seems, called hostigation. I mostly use it to be able to VPN
> out of a corporate network (In a dorm for an internship and it has ALL
> incoming ports blocked, or at least the ones I could possibly use). Recently
> I expanded to using it for a few IRC bots i am writing, and an XDCC server
> on an IRC channel I am in. I am fairly happy I was able to get all of it
> running on a minimal debian build using a total of 35ish MB of ram when
> everything is running.
>
> Anyway, enough rambling. What are yalls thoughts on the matter?
>
> Winston
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tuxaloosa.org/pipermail/tuxaloosa/attachments/20110721/3065ff42/attachment.html>

From wrmilling at gmail.com  Thu Jul 21 23:52:22 2011
From: wrmilling at gmail.com (Winston Milling)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:52:22 -0400
Subject: [Tuxaloosa] Low-End Boxes
Message-ID: <CAOoVq6w8KF5G1Boo6rNAMu9QTJXw47QLcn91-+Yk+TagDZiRMA@mail.gmail.com>

I have been messing around with a few low end boxes, mostly found through
http://lowendbox.com, and I was wondering if anyone else in the group
buys/has bought/ or uses anything that fits that bill. What are your
experiences, who is good, etc. Right now I am primarily with a company, or
single guy it seems, called hostigation. I mostly use it to be able to VPN
out of a corporate network (In a dorm for an internship and it has ALL
incoming ports blocked, or at least the ones I could possibly use). Recently
I expanded to using it for a few IRC bots i am writing, and an XDCC server
on an IRC channel I am in. I am fairly happy I was able to get all of it
running on a minimal debian build using a total of 35ish MB of ram when
everything is running.

Anyway, enough rambling. What are yalls thoughts on the matter?

Winston
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tuxaloosa.org/pipermail/tuxaloosa/attachments/20110721/6cd2362e/attachment-0001.html>